Some debating points of investment promotion in the form of public–private partnership.

Authors

  • В. Хмель (Khmel V.)
  • Ш. Джао (Zhao Sh.)

Abstract

Стремительный рост необходимости развития транспортной инфраструктуры потребовал значительных финансовых средств на ее развитие и поддержание. Традиционных источников финансирования транспортной инфраструктуры с каждым годом становится недостаточно. В связи с этим нестандартные формы финансирования, подразумевающие привлечение внебюджетных средств в сферу транспортных коммуникаций, с каждым годом набирают все большую популярность. Государственно–частное партнерство (ГЧП) имеет много преимуществ по сравнению с другими формами привлечения средств. На сегодняшний день оно является одной из актуальных тем для обсуждения. Однако при наличии различных целей партнеров, партнерство должно быть выгодным как для государства, так и для частного инвестора. В настоящее время механизм ГЧП приходит в экономику Республики Беларусь. В этой статье автор указывает на основные разногласия партнеров, с которыми может столкнуться Беларусь при реализации транспортных проектов в рамках ЧГП. = The urgent necessity of transport infrastructure development requires significant financial resources for its construction and maintenance. There are no sufficient traditional sources for these purposes. There-fore the use of innovative forms of financing implying obtaining of extra budgetary resources for the transportation sphere becomes more and more popular year after year. Public–private partnership (PPP) has many advantages over other forms of fundraising. Today it is one of the most pressing topics for discussion. But goals of partners are different. However, partnership should be beneficial for both state and private investors. At present the mechanism of PPP becomes more and more relevant for the economy of Belarus. The author of this paper defines the main disagreements between the partners which the Republic of Belarus may face in implementation of transport projects within the PPP. Key words: financing of transport infrastructure; public–private partnership (PPP); possible disagree-ments between partners; Republic of Belarus.

References

A Comparative Analysis of Public– Private Partnership (PPP) Coordination Agencies in India: What Works and What Doesn't /AshwinMahalingam [et al.] // Public Works Management & Policy. – 2011. – Vol. 16(4). – P. 341–372.

Bystrov, S. A. On the prospects the construction of toll roads in Russia. / S. A. Bystrov // Industrial policy in the Russian Federation. – 2005. – № 2. – P. 3 – 6.

Poole, R. W. Protecting the Public interest in long–term highway concessions / Robert W. Poole // Transportation Research News. – 2001. – Number 274, May–June. – P. 28 – 32.

Garvin, M.J. International practices in public–private partnerships: Synthesis and discussion /Michael J. Garv-in // Transportation Research News. – 2001. – Number 274, May–June. – P. 10 – 15.

Vining, A.R., Boardman, A. E. Public–Private Partnerships Eight Rules for Governments /Aidan R. Vining, Anthony E. Boardman // Public Works Management & Policy. – 2008. – Vol. 13 (2). – P. 149 – 161.

Rev, H. L. Public – Private Partnerships and Insurance Regulation / Harv. L. Rev // Harvard law review. – 2008. – Vol. 121 (5). – P. 1367 – 1386.

Litvina, I. Partnership / I. Litvin // Respublika [Electronic resource]. – 2011. – № 219 (5382). – Mode of access http://www.respublika.info/5382/roundtable/article51062/. – Date of access: 12/06/2011.

Hammami, M. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/99 / Mona Hammami, Jean–Francois Ruhashyankiko, Etienne B. Yehoue // Determinants of Public–Private Partnerships in Infrastructure [Electronic resource]. – 2006. – Mode of access: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp0699.pdf. – Date of access: 15.02.2011.

Tochitskaya, I. Partnerships of public and private sectors / I. Tochitskaya// IPM Research Center [Electronic resource]. – 2007. – Mode of access: http://research.by/pdf/pp2007r01.pdf.– Date of access: 12/06/2011.

Korol, N. Road, road, you signify so much .../ N/ Korol// Respublika [Electronic resource]. – 2012. – № 253 (5416). – Mode of access: http://www.respublika.info/5416/region/article51944/ – Date of access: 01/04/2012.

The College of the State Control Committee considered the results of the inspection target and efficient use of budget funds by organizations of road sector // State Control Committee of Belarus [Electronic resource]. –2011.– Mode of access: http : // www.kgk.gov.by/ru/kommentarii/v–xode–proverki–organizatsij–dorozhnogo–xozjajstva–

vyjavleny–mnogochislennye–fakty–neobosnovannogo–zavyshenija–objemov–i–stoimosti–vypolnennyx–

rabot_i_7550.html . – Date of access: 23/05/2011.

Davies, S. Paper 39 – Private Finance Initiative (PFI) and Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): Definitions and Sources / S. Davies, P. Fairbrother // School of Social Science, Cardiff University [Electronic resource]. – 2003. – Mode of access: http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/research/publications/ workingpapers/paper–39.html – Date of access: 29.11.2011.

How to Cite

Хмель (Khmel V.) В., & Джао (Zhao Sh.) Ш. (2015). Some debating points of investment promotion in the form of public–private partnership. Economy and Banks, (1), 48-52. Retrieved from https://ojs.polessu.by/EB/article/view/484

Issue

Section

Issues of regional economy