Composing the Synthetic Defense Index. Some Methodological Notes on Constructing the Measure for Determining the Strength of Antitakeover Charter Provisions Composition

Authors

  • Marek Szymanski

Abstract

В статье рассмотрены некоторые методологические проблемы, связанные с вычислительной основой синтетического метода измерения защищенности компании от недружественного поглощения. Такой метод может быть полезным для дальнейших исследований, касающихся финансовых последствий введения, удаления или изменения противопоглотительных мер в Уставе компании. Традиционно используемые методы не учитывают особенности систем права стран и не учитывают некоторые теоретические ограничения. С учетом этих недостатков приводятся предложения с целью достигнуть «правильных» значений показателей. Ключевые слова: методологические проблемы, финансовые последствия, Устав компании, синтетический индекс защиты, поглощение. This paper presents some methodological problems with computing sole, synthetic measure of company’s safeguard against the hostile takeover. Such a measure could be useful in further researches concerning financial effects of introducing, removing or existing of antitakeover charter provisions. Commonly used measures suffer for inadequacy to other countries law systems and for disregarding some theoretical constraints. From these weaknesses the general proposals on how to design the “right” index results. Key words: shark repellents; technical barriers to takeover; antitakeover charter provisions, synthetic defense index; hostile takeovers; publicly traded companies.

References

Bebchuk, L. A. and Cohen, A. The Cost of Entrenched Boards, “NBER Working Paper nr 10587”, June 2004

Bebchuk L.A., Cohen A., Ferrell, A. (2009) What matters in corporate governance? „The Review of Financial Studies” 22 (2), 783–827

Bebchuk, L. A., Coates IV, J. C., and Subrmanian, G. The powerful antitakeover force of staggered boards: theory, evidence, and policy, Stanford Law Review 54 May 2002, pp. 887–951

Becker–Blease J. R. (2011) Governance and innovation, „Journal of Corporate Finance”, 17, str. 947–958

Bhagat S, Bolton B. Corporate governance and firm performance, „Journal of Corporate Finance” 14 (2008), str. 257–273

Bruner, R. F. Applied mergers and acquisitions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken 2004

Coates IV, J. C. Takeover Defenses in the Shadow of the Pill: A Critique of the Scientific Evidence, Texas Law Review Vol. 79, No. 2, Dec. 2000, pp. 271–382

Dawson, S. S., Pence, R. J., and Stone, D. S. Poison pill defensive measures, The Business Lawyer Vol. 42, No. 2, Feb. 1987, pp. 423–439

DeAngelo, H. and Rice, E. M. Antitakeover charters amendments and stockholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 11 (1983), pp. 329–360

Eckbo, B. E. The Market for Corporate Control: Policy Issues and Capital Market Evidence in: Khemani, R. S., Shapiro, D. M., and Stanbury, W. T (eds.) Mergers, Corporate Concentration and Power in Canada, The Institute for Research on Public Policy, Halifax 1988, pp. 143–225

Elyasiani E., Zhang L. (2015) CEO entrenchment and corporate liquidity management, „Journal of Banking & Finance”, 54, str. 115–128

Ferrarini, G. Share Ownership, Takeover Law and the Contestability of Corporate Control Company Law Reform in OECD Countries. A Comparative Outlook of Current Trends. Conference Proceedings

Ferrell, A. Why Continental European Takeover Law Matters Harvard Law School, Discussion Paper 454, 12/2003

Gaughan, P. A. Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructuring, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 1996

Gilson R. J. The case against shark repellent amendments: Structural limitations on the enabling concept, Stanford Law Review 34 (1982), pp. 775–836

Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., and Metrick, A. Corporate Governance and Equity Prices, “NBER Working Paper nr 8449”, August 2001

Harford J., Mansih S. A., Maxwelle W. Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US, “Journal of Financial Economics” 87 (2008) pp. 535–555

Hochman, S. A. and Fogler, O. D. Deflecting takeovers: Charter and by–law techniques, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 34, No. 2, Jan. 1979, pp. 537–573

Jarrell,G. A. and Paulsen A. B. Shark repellents and stock prices: The effect of antitakeover amendments since 1980, Journal of Financial Economics 19 (1987), pp. 127–168.

Jiraporn P., Kim Y. S., Davidson W. N., Singh M. (2006) Corporate governance, shareholder rights and firm diversification: An empirical analysis, „Journal of Banking & Finance”, 30, str. 947–963.

Johnson, M. S. and Rao, R. P. The Impact of Antitakeover Amendments on Corporate Financial Performance “The Financial Review”, Vol. 32, No. 3, November 1997, pp. 659–689.

Kabir, R., Cantrijn, D., and Jeunink, A. Takeover defences, ownership structure and stock returns in the Netherlands: an empirical analysis, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:2 (1997), pp. 97–109

Linn, S. C and McConnell, J. J. An empirical investigation of the impact of ‘antitakeover’ amendments on common stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics 11 (1983), pp. 361–399

Mahoney, J. M., Sundaramurthy, C., and Mahoney, J. T. The Effects of Corporate Antitakeover Provisions on Long–term Investment: Empirical Evidence, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 18 (1997), pp. 349–365

Meulbroek, L. K., Mitchell, M. L., Mulherin, J. H., Netter, J. M., and Poulsen, A. B. Shark Repellents and Managerial Myopia: An Empirical Test, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, Part 1. (Oct., 1990), pp. 1108–1117

Michel, A. and Shaked, I. Takeover madness. Corporate America fights back, John Wiley & Sons 1986

Rose, C. Impact of takeover defences on managerial incentives, 2002 FMA European Doctoral Student Seminar

Stráska M., Waller G. (2010) Do antitakeover provisions harm shareholders? „Journal of Corporate Finance”, 16, str. 487–497

Szymański M., Nogalski B. (2011) Obrona przed wrogim przejęciem. Jak ochronić swój biznes, Wolters Kluwer Polska.

Szymański M. (2012) Czy feudałowie łupią chłopów? Funkcjonowanie shark repellents w polskich spółkach publicznych [w:] D. Zarzecki (red.) Zarządzanie finansami. Inwestycje, wycena przedsiębiorstw, zarządzanie wartością, „Zeszyty Naukowe nr 690”, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Szczecin 2012, str. 865–878

Wasserstein, B. Big deal: the battle for control of America’s leading, Warner Books, New York 1998

Weston, J. F. and Weaver, S. C. Mergers and Acquisitions McGrow–Hill, New York 200

How to Cite

Szymanski, M. (2017). Composing the Synthetic Defense Index. Some Methodological Notes on Constructing the Measure for Determining the Strength of Antitakeover Charter Provisions Composition. Economy and Banks, (2), 42-48. Retrieved from https://ojs.polessu.by/EB/article/view/798

Issue

Section

Finance, money circulation and credit